Abortion Research - Abortion Pill, Procedure, Facts, Information

Abortion Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Abortion, including details on abortion pill, procedure, facts, information.


Abortion Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Abortion

Books on Abortion

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Impact of the sex of first child on the prognosis in secondary recurrent miscarriage.

Christiansen OB, Pedersen B, Nielsen HS, Nybo Andersen AM

Fertility Clinic 4071, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. obc@pregnancyloss.dk

BACKGROUND: The carriage of a male fetus often initiates maternal immunological reactions against male-specific minor histocompatibility (HY) antigens, which, in theory, could result in subsequent recurrent miscarriage (RM). METHODS: Information about subsequent pregnancy outcome was procured among 182 women with RM after a birth (secondary RM) referred since 1986 using questionnaires, telephone interviews and registers. RESULTS: Significantly more of the women had had a male first-born as compared with a female first-born (110 versus 72; P < 0.02). By January 2002, 58% of those who had a male first-born had given birth to a second live infant compared with 76% of those who previously had had a female first-born (P = 0.01). Women in the former group had a significantly lower chance of having a second child than those in the latter (adjusted hazard ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.41-0.86). The number of miscarriages after admission and the risk of secondary infertility were significantly greater in women with a male first-born than among those with a female first-born (P < 0.001 and P = 0.02; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A male first-born seems to be associated with a less favourable reproductive potential among women with secondary RM. Maternal immunization against HY antigens may be responsible for these findings.

Published 19 November 2004 in Hum Reprod, 19(12): 2946-51.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Abortion Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Abortion Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Abortion Books

Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion

Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion